On Feb 17, 2014, at 9:19 PM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 17, 2014, at 5:10 PM, Michael Hamburg <mike at shiftleft.org> wrote: > >> Even in a trivial case, I can’t convince either clang-3.3 or > > > Clang3.3 is really old. Please try the latest LLVM. Same result on clang version 3.5 (trunk 201542). -- Mike