[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.6 update

[Chandler Carruth]

LGTM

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Daniel Sanders
> <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote:
> > Could we aim for mid/late January? I'd like our target triple problems
> to be sorted out for LLVM 3.6 if I can and early-January doesn't leave many
> working days to get that finished. Especially given that many people take
> some holiday around Christmas and New Year.
> >
>
> We generally try to make the releases on a fixed 6-month cycle rather
> than wait for features. By this time last year the release was already
> in full swing so I don't want to wait much longer.
>
> But, I do want to give folks a chance to return from vacations
> (including myself). I think 14 January would be a good date to aim
> for.
>
> This would be the tentative schedule:
>
> - 14 January 2015: Branch for 3.6.0 release
>   All features should be basically ready. *Minor* changes to complete
> things are accepted during Test Phase I.
>
> - 14 January -- 21 January: Testing Phase I
>   RC1 binaries are built and tested
>
> - 22 January -- 29 January: Fix bugs from Testing Phase I
>   All features should be complete. Any incomplete features need to be
> turned off by default.
>
> - 30 January -- 6 Feburary: Testing Phase II
>   RC2 binaries are built and tested
>
> - 7 February -- 14 February: Fix bugs from Testing Phase II
>   Only critical bug fixes are accepted. The bugs fixed here are
> release blockers.
>
> - 21 February: Release 3.6.0.
>
> If this looks OK, I'll post it on the web page.
>
>  - Hans
>
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu]
> >> On Behalf Of Renato Golin
> >> Sent: 15 December 2014 18:37
> >> To: Hans Wennborg
> >> Cc: cfe-dev; llvmdev
> >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 3.6 update
> >>
> >> On 15 December 2014 at 17:44, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > My tentative plan is to branch early January.
> >>
> >> That sounds reasonable. I'd say whenever the 3.5.1 finishes we could
> start
> >> 3.6.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> --renato
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141217/9f737c5c/attachment.html>