[LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase Begins

[Sebastian Dreßler]

Yeah, I was just puzzled :D No worries.

Cheers,
Sebastian

2014-12-16 11:09 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>:
> It looks like I missed that email completely, I started out replying to
> Nikola and Hans which is why I was talking about Windows rather than OS X.
>
>
>
> I've just found your first email in my llvmdev folder and I think I see what
> happened. My mail rules deliver llvmdev messages to a folder named llvmdev
> unless I'm directly addressed in which case it delivers to my inbox. It
> looks like you pruned the recipient list when you replied to Tom's email so
> that one email was delivered to llvmdev while the rest of the thread was
> delivered to my inbox. Then when I replied to Hans and Nikola it seems I
> pruned the recipient list (I don't remember doing this and it's unusual for
> me but that's what the emails say). You presumably saw my email and thought
> I was replying to you and things got confused from there.
>
>
>
> I'll commit that patch to the trunk and ask Tom for permission to merge it.
>
>
>
> From: sebastian.dressler at gmail.com [mailto:sebastian.dressler at gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 December 2014 05:20
> To: Daniel Sanders
> Cc: Ben Pope; Nikola Smiljanic; llvmdev
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase Begins
>
>
>
>
>
> On 15.12.2014, at 23:01, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: sebastian.dressler at gmail.com [sebastian.dressler at gmail.com]
> Sent: 15 December 2014 18:41
> To: Daniel Sanders
> Cc: Ben Pope; Nikola Smiljanic; llvmdev
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase Begins
>
> For sake of completeness, I copy the output again:
>
> Command Output (stderr): […]
>
>
> That's given me enough to figure out the problem. %gp_rel is only used when
> the small data section is enabled and that's only supposed to be the case
> for bare-metal. However, the guard is actually a test for 'is not Linux' and
> this condition is of course true for windows.
>
>
>
> Just out of curiosity: this information was also contained in my initial
> mail, did you probably overlook it?
>
>
>
> It's not a new bug (it was in 3.5.0 too) but the testcase is new. Does the
> attached patch fix the problem for you?<arguments-struct.patch>
>
>
>
> Yes, it fixes it.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>