[LLVMdev] [RFC] Requiring python 2.6

Rafael EspĂ­ndola rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Fri Dec 12 07:51:19 PST 2014


So far two bots have complained about 2.7 (but have 2.6):

http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-i686-cygwin-RA-centos6/builds/12836/steps/configure/logs/stdio
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-s390x-linux1/builds/12002/steps/configure/logs/stdio

Should we just upgrade those bots or reduce the requirement to 2.6?


On 12 December 2014 at 06:41, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote:
> +1
>
> My view on this is that lit is a testing tool. If someone is competent
> enough to build LLVM and run the tests then they're probably competent
> enough to build a newer version of Python if for some reason they
> can't obtain pre-built version.
>
> I use lit outside of LLVM for several projects but I always use Python
>>= 2.7 so it's not a problem for me.
>
> I'd also be in favour of bumping the required version higher and require 2.7



More information about the llvm-dev mailing list