[LLVMdev] why 'const' void * return for ThreadLocalImpl::getInstance()?
Andy Ayers
andya at microsoft.com
Thu Dec 11 18:48:27 PST 2014
Yeah, I was using that -- I have, more or less,
struct S {...};
llvm::sys::ThreadLocal<S> TLS;
S * s = TLS.get();
The static_cast in ThreadLocal::get is where the compiler gripes…. Unable to convert from ‘const void *’ to ‘S *’.
From: David Majnemer [mailto:david.majnemer at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:39 PM
To: Andy Ayers
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] why 'const' void * return for ThreadLocalImpl::getInstance()?
I think you are supposed to use ThreadLocal::get in cases where you want a pointer to mutable data: http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/classllvm_1_1sys_1_1ThreadLocal.html#a66c83dcd38d9048a4f95255e44f13a0c
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Andy Ayers <andya at microsoft.com<mailto:andya at microsoft.com>> wrote:
I’m probably missing something obvious here, but naively, this makes it kind of awkward to have mutable thread local state…
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20141212/f22f0bec/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list