[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump

[Rafael Espíndola]

> btw, for tools that we consider as internal testing tools, there has
> historically been pushback for adding user-visible features if they do not
> serve an immediate need within the LLVM codebase (CC'ing Rafael: does
> llvm-objdump fall under this category?).

I don't think so. If I remember correctly the reason for having
llvm-readobj and llvm-objdump is that readobj can be whatever we want
for testing and llvm-objdump can match as closely as practical the
system (gnu?) objdump.

Cheers,
Rafael