[LLVMdev] Proposal for ""llvm.mem.vectorize.safelen"
Renato Golin
renato.golin at linaro.org
Wed Aug 20 09:00:07 PDT 2014
On 20 August 2014 16:17, Robison, Arch <arch.robison at intel.com> wrote:
> But safelen is different. It's an assertion about safety, so prefixing it with
> llvm.loop.vectorize seems inappropriate. Does is sound reasonable to drop
> the "vectorize" portion. Maybe spell it something like this?
This was true to all *current* vectorizer pragmas, but certainly not
safelen. I think we can change that description instead of changing
the namespace.
cheers,
--renato
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list