[LLVMdev] Semantics of noalias with vector of pointers?

[Matt Arsenault]

On 09/04/2013 03:16 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:
> Do you actually have a use case for such attributes, or are you just 
> trying all possible attributes on all possible types to see what 
> breaks? ;-)

I'm mostly just breaking things. I randomly ended up on the bug about 
the zext vector parameters and thought it should work.

>
> It would be theoretically possible to define semantics for 
> signext/zerext or even noalias for vectors. However it's not clear 
> whether those are really desirable without motivating use cases.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130904/c91991f0/attachment.html>