[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
Chandler Carruth
chandlerc at google.com
Thu Oct 31 11:54:25 PDT 2013
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
> On 31 October 2013 09:41, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Not quite :). At present, we (= Apple) still have some dependencies on
>> building top-of-tree Clang with VS2010. We’re currently investigating how
>> quickly we can move those to VS2012 or newer.
>>
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Good to know. Since this is mostly related to 3.5, we still have
> half-a-year to make sure it won't break big things.
>
>
> Yeah. I’d like to hear about regarding Chrome’s dependencies as well; we
> don’t want to break them.
As discussed in a bunch of different places, Chrome should be fine here.
You'll note that I replied directly to Ted's post asking whether the
timeframe would be reasonable or what would be reasonable, and will
naturally be waiting to hear back from him before anything happens. =]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131031/cc1060cb/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list