[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
Renato Golin
renato.golin at linaro.org
Sun Oct 27 23:03:27 PDT 2013
On 27 October 2013 21:13, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> I think that just establishing a floor on the problem (a soft one, which
> naturally has to be interpreted based on the realities at the time) is the
> best first step. I *don't* want to lose the ability to host LLVM and Clang
> with reasonably modern C++ toolchains that are not Clang-derived. I *do*
> want to set expectations with clear guidelines for what we consider
> "reasonably modern" to be.
>
I couldn't agree more.
My jump the gun moment was due to the fact that I always estimate
minimum/expected/maximum outcomes, to make sure they follow a nice linear
scale with respect to features/work/cost/time. Having the "previous
support" as standard would be a maximum, in a world where Clang/LLVM is the
de-facto standard on all platforms. It'll never happen, but it's a
direction that would bring nice surrounding improvements if pursued.
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131027/e2caa1d5/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list