[LLVMdev] SchedMachineModel clarifications

[Umesh Kalappa]

Thanks mike will make required changes .please someone from the group can
hint me how to use llvm performance to benchmark ?

Thanks
Umesh

On Friday, November 22, 2013, Mike Vermeulen wrote:

> I made a quick cross check with information in the SWOG (Software
> Optimization Guide).  The port assignments look consistent.  A few of the
> latency values are slightly different from the SWOG, e.g. WriteFRcp --> 6,
> WriteFSqrt --> 29 and WriteCvt* --> 4 seem to be suggested instead.
>
> Others are in better position to describe how to use llvm performance
> framework.
>
> --mev, Mike Vermeulen (work for AMD but posting from non-AMD email)
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Umesh Kalappa <umesh.kalappa0 at gmail.com<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'umesh.kalappa0 at gmail.com');>
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Thank you for the link and my bad last  mail has the old patch file.
>>
>> Please have look at the attached patch file  herewith,which  has the
>> latest changes.
>>
>> i'm new to llvm testing framework and cross compilation  as such ,Please
>> can you through some lights like references etc ,Which states that  how can
>> i  cross compile the llvm for Bulldozer and run  the performance test
>>  against my changes.So  that i can tune for a better result.
>>
>> Thanks
>> ~Umesh
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131122/78b74b9d/attachment.html>