[LLVMdev] Issues with inline assembly

[Tim Northover]

> There’s not a strong philosophical objection or anything like that to adding
> aliases for them. As the previous thread indicates, there’s subtleties
> involved, so it’s important that patches doing something about it are well
> documented about what they do, don’t do, and why. With that caveat, patches
> for fixing this would be very welcome.

I think it (well, a dodgy set of limits & semantics, but probably best
not to rehash that) actually happened after that last thread. At
least, my trunk now accepts the syntax mentioned by Razvan.

Cheers.

Tim.