[LLVMdev] Any objections to my importing GoogleMock to go with GoogleTest in LLVM?

[Rafael Espíndola]

> I think the cost of carrying it around is essentially zero. I'm happy to do
> any of the maintenance. People who don't know how to use it or want to learn
> how to use it don't need to use it. If it isn't making their job of writing
> tests sufficiently easier to justify, then they don't use it. I see this as
> a good pattern.

That is not the case. If the test finds any bug at all, people have to
look at the testcase and see if it is failing.

Even if not bug is found, someone doing refactoring has to change the
test to use the new apis.

Cheers,
Rafael