[LLVMdev] Debug info: type uniquing for C++ and the status on building clang with "-flto -g"

[David Blaikie]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Manman,
>>
>> Thanks for sending this summary and progress plans - it's great to see
>> the impact your changes have had and ideas for future direction.
>>
>> Type uniquing for C++ is in. Some data for Xalan with -flto -g:
>>> 9.9MB raw dwarf size, peak memory usage at 2.8GB
>>> The raw dwarf size was 58MB, memory usage was 7GB back in May, 2013.
>>> Other efforts at size reduction helped, and type uniquing improved on
>>> top of those.
>>>
>>> Data on building clang with "-flto -g" after type uniquing:
>>>   3.4GB MDNodes after parsing all bc files, 7GB MDNodes after linking
>>> all bc files
>>>
>>
>> What's the change between parsing and linking?
>>
> Parsing means reading in all bc files to source modules. Linking means
> linking in the source modules to the destination module.
> Extra MDNodes can be generated for the destination module.
>

OK, that's perhaps strange - do you have any ideas about what MDNodes we
create when linking modules together? If anyhting I would expect a
reduction in size as MDNodes are deduplicated across multiple modules. Are
you measuring this after the original modules have been unloaded? Are we
not unloading those modules once we've created the merged module?


>
>
>>
>>>    4.6GB DIEs
>>>
>>
>> It seems like the DIEs are a substantial (more than the pre-linked, but
>> post-parsed BC files) part of the footprint. I think it might be important
>> to do the CU-at-a-time work sooner rather than later as I'm concerned about
>> the design impact it will have on existing and future work (it's already
>> going to substantially change the cross-CU-DIE references, potentially
>> changing the cost/benefit of that feature since we cannot inject DIEs from
>> later CUs into prior ones).
>>
>>
>>>   4G MCContext
>>>
>>
>> What's the data in the MCContext that's relevant to debug info?
>>
>
> One data point on "Xalan":
> without -g, MCContext allocates 45MB,
> with -g, MCContext allocates 286MB.
>

OK, might be useful to understand which parts of that - maybe the Values
(ints, strings, etc) themselves are being attributed to the MCContext
rather than the MDNode sizes you were reporting above? Not really sure.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131112/b65a781d/attachment.html>