[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers
"C. Bergström"
cbergstrom at pathscale.com
Wed Nov 6 11:12:26 PST 2013
On 11/ 7/13 01:50 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
<snip>
> However, Tim's position is important to consider: we've been talking
> about this for a long while, but because no one actually set the date,
> packagers and side projects just ignored as a problem 'to deal later,
> when it really happens'. So, as much as I understand the work that
> needs to be done by the side projects, there has been a lot of warning
> for almost a year (if not more).
warnings are not errors - I think everyone is in agreement this should
happen or at least not opposed to it from what I've read.
My view and seems to be supported by a (small?) handful of others
Dec 1st == too soon
Jan 15th-Feb 1st == ok (that's my position)
----------
This virtual discussion needs to stop - Things need to move forward. The
missing pieces in my mind are 2
1) Someone proposes an updated style guide for review
2) Date which ToT becomes open for C++11 hunting
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list