[LLVMdev] Appropriate DS for implementing worklist

Rekha R rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in
Sun Nov 3 07:38:57 PST 2013


Thank you David for prompt reply.

I tried with SmallVector. I inserted elements with push_back().
But when I retrieve elements using pop_back_val the elements are returned
in reverse order of insertion (I mean like LIFO order).
I need this to be FIFO order. How to achieve that?

Regards,
Rekha


On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 8:31 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

> If you don't care about efficiency you can push (or at least insert) at
> the front of a(small or otherwise) vector.
> On Nov 3, 2013 3:32 AM, "Rekha R" <rekharamapai at nitc.ac.in> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am writing an analysis which requires creating worklist of basic
>> blocks. The worklist should be in FIFO order. I checked SmallVector (and
>> similar others) and found out this is working in LIFO order when I use the
>> functions push_back and pop_back_val to insert and delete elements in the
>> worklist.
>>
>> Can someone suggest an appropriate DS to implement my worklist. Note: I
>> am not concerned about efficiency here.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Rekha
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>>


-- 
Rekha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131103/cf078d7e/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list