[LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?

Alexey Samsonov samsonov at google.com
Mon May 27 00:36:05 PDT 2013


On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <
eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > When I build compiler-rt with clang 3.2, all lsan tests pass.  The only
> > failing tests I see are in ubsan:
> >
> > Failing Tests (6):
> >     UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Float/cast-overflow.cpp
> >     UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Integer/add-overflow.cpp
> >     UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Integer/div-zero.cpp
> >     UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Integer/sub-overflow.cpp
> >     UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Integer/uadd-overflow.cpp
> >     UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer :: Integer/usub-overflow.cpp
> >
> >
> > When I build with gcc 4.4.3, I need the changes below to get the source
> to
> > compile (and then the lsan tests fails).  What are you all using to build
> > compiler-rt?  are you developing on linux, osx or windows?  Using gcc or
> > llvm?  Which should I expect to work?  Any buildbots running?
>
>
As Evgeniy said, we build compiler-rt on Linux and on Mac OS X, and run
tests for various sanitizers on our buildbots.
Note that CMake build system of compiler-rt uses host compiler to build it.
On Linux we use:
1) gcc 4.6.3
2) tip-of-the-trunk Clang,
and tests pass under both of these.

gcc 4.4.3 seems way too old, so in some sense we've dropped support for it
(you have to make changes, as old gcc is not
smart enough to make some POD variables thread-local).


> I think we build compiler-rt with the host compiler, except for
> Android. Which is usually a recently-built clang. n Linux, but we
> exercise osx build on our buildbots.
> We never build with compiler-rt not in projects/.
> Our bot scripts are here:
>
> https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fbuild%2Fscripts%2Fslave
> The bots itself are not publicly visible, we hope to change that soon.
>
> >
> > And lastly, are there build instructions to build the Android shared
> object?
> > Is there any way to build an android static lib?  How about for
> arm-linux?
>
> Android runtime is special, we build it in a separate build tree
> configured with
> -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=$LLVM_CHECKOUT/cmake/platforms/Android.cmake
> See buildbot_cmake.sh for details.
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Greg
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/interception/interception.h
> > b/lib/interception/interception.h
> > index d50af35..1771d4e 100644
> > --- a/lib/interception/interception.h
> > +++ b/lib/interception/interception.h
> > @@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ typedef __sanitizer::uptr    SIZE_T;
> >  typedef __sanitizer::sptr    SSIZE_T;
> >  typedef __sanitizer::sptr    PTRDIFF_T;
> >  typedef __sanitizer::s64     INTMAX_T;
> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T   OFF_T;
> > -typedef __sanitizer::OFF64_T OFF64_T;
> > +//typedef __sanitizer::OFF_T   OFF_T;
> > +//typedef __sanitizer::OFF64_T OFF64_T;
> >
> >  // How to add an interceptor:
> >  // Suppose you need to wrap/replace system function (generally, from
> libc):
> > diff --git a/lib/lsan/lsan_allocator.cc b/lib/lsan/lsan_allocator.cc
> > index 9bf27b1..190dce8 100644
> > --- a/lib/lsan/lsan_allocator.cc
> > +++ b/lib/lsan/lsan_allocator.cc
> > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ typedef CombinedAllocator<PrimaryAllocator,
> > AllocatorCache,
> >            SecondaryAllocator> Allocator;
> >
> >  static Allocator allocator;
> > -static THREADLOCAL AllocatorCache cache;
> > +static /*THREADLOCAL*/ AllocatorCache cache;
> >
> >  void InitializeAllocator() {
> >    allocator.Init();
> > diff --git a/lib/msan/msan_allocator.cc b/lib/msan/msan_allocator.cc
> > index 7435843..3e6adb6 100644
> > --- a/lib/msan/msan_allocator.cc
> > +++ b/lib/msan/msan_allocator.cc
> > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ typedef LargeMmapAllocator<> SecondaryAllocator;
> >  typedef CombinedAllocator<PrimaryAllocator, AllocatorCache,
> >                            SecondaryAllocator> Allocator;
> >
> > -static THREADLOCAL AllocatorCache cache;
> > +static /*THREADLOCAL*/ AllocatorCache cache;
> >  static Allocator allocator;
> >
> >  static int inited = 0;
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I blame this line in lsan/lit_tests/lit.cfg:
> >>
> >> # Setup attributes common for all compiler-rt projects.
> >> compiler_rt_lit_cfg = os.path.join(llvm_src_root, "projects",
> >> "compiler-rt",
> >>                                    "lib", "lit.common.cfg")
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > it assumes that compiler-rt is checked out to
> >>>> > llvm/projects/compiler-rt. Apparently, this is a problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have a patch for this ready.  I'll send it to you and llvm-commits.
> >>>> Most of the tests pass with "make check-all" but the recently-added
> lsan
> >>>> tests are all failing.  Do those fail for you as well?  If so, can we
> XFAIL
> >>>> them for now and try to keep the "make check-all" build clean?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks! I'll take a look at the patch today. LSan tests work fine for
> me,
> >>> and we have them on our buildbot as well. What are the failures you
> see?
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Greg
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The docs look strange to me - I don't indeed see any CMake support
> for
> >>>>> running compiler-rt tests.
> >>>>> Probably compiler-rt folks can comment on this...
> >>>>> I think you should run compilert-rt tests manually by smth. like
> >>>>> compiler-rt/test/Unit/test.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> CMake build system is able of running a bunch of sanitizer tests
> >>>>> (AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer etc.), and it assumes that
> >>>>> compiler-rt is checked out to llvm/projects/compiler-rt. Apparently,
> >>>>> this is a problem. There was a patch that tried to address this, but
> >>>>> it never got committed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anybody working on porting the compiler-rt tests to cmake?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The online documentation shows a preference for cmake and ctest, but
> >>>>>> the CMakeLists file has the comment "Currently the tests have not
> been
> >>>>>> ported to CMake, so disable this directory."  How should we be
> running the
> >>>>>> test suite?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://compiler-rt.llvm.org/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My immediate issue is that "make check-all" fails in the cmake build
> >>>>>> when compiler-rt is outside the projects directory.  When I point to
> >>>>>> compiler-rt with LLVM_EXTERNAL_COMPILER_RT_SOURCE_DIR, lit still
> looks for
> >>>>>> lit.common.cfg within "projects/compiler-rt" instead of the external
> >>>>>> directory.  I use similar CMake variables for Clang and Polly and
> have had
> >>>>>> no trouble.  Any recommendations for how to fix?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Greg
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
> >>>>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> >>>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Alexey Samsonov, MSK
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Alexey Samsonov, MSK
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>



-- 
Alexey Samsonov, MSK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130527/a75db750/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list