[LLVMdev] Unsupported MCJIT tests on ARM?
Amara Emerson
amara.emerson at gmail.com
Sat May 18 09:42:44 PDT 2013
Remote mcjit has never worked on arm. By removing the assertion, we're no
longer seeing deterministic failures. I think by fixing PR16013 we'll
enable support for remote mcjit on arm, and can then remove the xfails
altogether.
In the meantime, marking the tests as unsupported seems to be the best
option. I don't have a machine for a few days but I can take a look at
finally cleaning up resolveRelocations() next week.
Amara
> Both A9 bots are running the same Ubuntu (13.03), with the same GCC
(4.7.2),
> and are the same hardware (Panda ES RevB), so it really strikes me as odd
> that we have such a different behaviour between them.
Hmm. I'll see what I can do on my tablet (not tried building LLVM
there before so it could take a while), it seems like there are *some*
failures everywhere. If we're lucky it'll just be a matter of fixing
the PR16013 that David reported.
Tim.
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130518/a9f02cd5/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list