[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing mem operands.
Nadav Rotem
nrotem at apple.com
Mon May 13 14:52:34 PDT 2013
The patch LGTM. The StackColoring patch is still too conservative and I am consulting with Jakob and Andy about possible solutions.
On May 13, 2013, at 10:33 AM, Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the email I sent last week.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Akira Hatanaka <ahatanak at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:04 PM
> Subject: [PATCH] Minor fix to StackColoring to avoid needlessly clearing mem operands.
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
>
>
> The following code snippet taken from StackColoring::remapInstructions clears a mem operand if it can't guarantee whether the memoperand's underlying value aliases with the merged allocas:
>
> // Update the MachineMemOperand to use the new alloca.
> 522 for (MachineInstr::mmo_iterator MM = I->memoperands_begin(),
> ....
> // Climb up and find the original alloca.
> 532 V = GetUnderlyingObject(V);
> 533 // If we did not find one, or if the one that we found is not in our
> 534 // map, then move on.
> 535 if (!V || !isa<AllocaInst>(V)) {
> 536 // Clear mem operand since we don't know for sure that it doesn't
> 537 // alias a merged alloca.
> 538 MMO->setValue(0);
> 539 continue;
> 540 }
>
> The attached patch makes the code above less conservative. It avoids clearing a mem operand if its underlying value is a PseudoSourceValue and PseudoSourceValue::isConstant returns true. This enables MachineLICM to hoist loads from GOT out of a loop (see test case in stackcoloring-test.patch).
>
> Please review.
>
> Question: Why does it need to clear a mem operand if the underlying object is not an AllocaInst? I am not sure if I understand the reason for this.
>
>
> <stackcoloring.patch><stackcoloring-test.patch>_______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130513/3d29da54/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list