[LLVMdev] gcc 4.8.x dragonegg support
Duncan Sands
baldrick at free.fr
Sat May 11 12:53:08 PDT 2013
Hi Jack,
On 09/05/13 18:21, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:53:05AM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
>> On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> Duncan,
>>> I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn
>>> for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic
>>> to work around without some additional substitute being added in FSF gcc upstream?
>>
>> Hi Jack,
>>
>> There's a patch under review to add gcc 4.8 support:
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130401/170127.html
>
> Peter,
> Thanks. With the second patch applied, current dragonegg 3.3svn builds under FSF gcc 4.8.1svn
> with the plugin header fix applied. There appears to be a regression in the Polyhedron 2005
> benchmarks for aermod and rnflow. The first fails to compile with the errror...
>
> % /sw/lib/gcc4.8/bin/gfortran -fplugin=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/dragonegg.so -specs=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/integrated-as.specs -O1 aermod.f90 -o aermod
does it happen without -specs=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/integrated-as.specs ?
Ciao, Duncan.
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
> "_iround", referenced from:
> _stodbl_ in ccZmJVlP.o
> _evper_ in ccZmJVlP.o
> "_iroundf", referenced from:
> _aver_ in ccZmJVlP.o
> _vdp_ in ccZmJVlP.o
> _stonum_ in ccZmJVlP.o
> _terrst_ in ccZmJVlP.o
> _hrqext_ in ccZmJVlP.o
> _averev_ in ccZmJVlP.o
> _wake_dfsn2_ in ccZmJVlP.o
> ...
> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> and the second as...
>
> % /sw/lib/gcc4.8/bin/gfortran -fplugin=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/dragonegg.so -specs=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/lib/integrated-as.specs -O1 rnflow.f90 -o rnflow
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
> "_iroundf", referenced from:
> _cmpmat_ in ccaC6IRb.o
> _MAIN__ in ccaC6IRb.o
> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Jack
>
>>
>> Part of that patch has already been applied. I gather that Duncan
>> has been busy with conference organisation so it may take some time
>> for him to review the rest of it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Peter
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list