[LLVMdev] does clang and llvm take more time to compile c code
Eric Lu
eirc.lew at gmail.com
Thu Jun 27 18:04:47 PDT 2013
Hi, Ben
gcc version is: 4.7.0
clang version is: 3.2
The command options are:
1) clang
generated object files: clang -O3 -c *.c -o x.o
link: clang *.o -lm -o mpeg2enc
2) gcc
generated object files: gcc -O3 -c *.c -o x.o
link: gcc *.o -lm -o mpeg2enc
Yes, maybe it is the config introduced problems, I build it with enable
debug options.
Thanks!
Eric
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com>wrote:
>
> On 27.06.2013, at 13:40, Eric Lu <eirc.lew at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello, all
> >
> > When I compile mpeg2enc of Mediabench, it seems clang and llvm take
> longer time than gcc. I meausre the time as follow:
> >
> > gcc -O3 8.190s
> > clang -O3 20.253s
> >
> > will this means clang and llvm are slower than gcc in compiling c code.
>
> Possibly. The timings are useless without information about the versions
> of GCC and clang used and the build configuration (clang is extremely slow
> when built without optimization).
>
> - Ben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130628/2ce979e5/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list