[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] llvm.org bug trend

[Nikola Smiljanic]

I'd say that bugzilla is in a very sad state. It doesn't seem to be a part
of the development flow (the way commit reviews or tests are). I did some
cleanup a month or two ago, mainly trying to close non issues. Went through
clang Driver and some C++ bugs and found a bunch of bugs that can't be
reproduced. Stuff from gcc stress tests that used to crash but no longer
does. Some bugs are only partially true, like
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14084, -print-stats is no longer
exposed through the driver but -time is and it doesn't work. It's unclear
if some bugs should be fixed, like
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6488 (It's
unclear if clang community is interested in supporting this). Some bugs
have attached patches that fix the issue in question, like this one
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13992 (the comments also tell a
story). And so on...

I would like to see bugzilla cleaned up and bug entry process somewhat
formalized so that entries meet certain quality.


On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 5:27 AM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:

> It would be really nice if our bug tracker had something like the "Issues:
> 30-day summary" that this jira instance has <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE>.
>
> Another interesting statistic that might be interesting to plot alongside
> the "open bugs" graph is "total lines of code" (or maybe just plot the
> ratio "bugs/LOC").
>
> -- Sean Silva
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Robinson, Paul <
> Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote:
>
>>  Over most of the past year, I have been keeping an eye on the overall
>> LLVM.org open-bug count.****
>>
>> Sampling the count (almost) every Monday morning, it is a consistently
>> non-decreasing number.****
>>
>> I thought I’d post something about it to the Dev lists, as the count
>> broke 4000 this past week.****
>>
>> For your entertainment here’s a chart that Excel produced from the data.
>> (To make it more****
>>
>> dramatic, I carefully did not use a proper zero point on the X-axis.)****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> I do not have per-category breakdowns, sorry, just the raw total.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Makes me think more seriously about cruising the bug list for something
>> that looks like****
>>
>> I could actually fix it…****
>>
>> --paulr****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> [image: cid:image001.png at 01CE8C56.9A40D7E0]****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-dev mailing list
>> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130731/1035626f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 11909 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130731/1035626f/attachment.png>