[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Coding standards: don't use ``inline`` when defining a function in a class definition

[Dmitri Gribenko]

Hello,

This came up on IRC in context of r173842, and it was suggested to
codify this unspoken rule.

Current practice is not to use 'inline' in:

  class Foo {
  public:
    inline void bar() {
      // ...
    }
  };

Dmitri

-- 
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: coding-standards-inline-v1.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 843 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130130/46ba8f64/attachment.obj>