[LLVMdev] [PATCH] parallel loop awareness to the LoopVectorizer

[Pekka Jääskeläinen]

On 01/28/2013 06:45 PM, Nadav Rotem wrote:
> I am okay with this patch, assuming that you follow the review of Tobias
> and Renato and provide a separate patch for the min-iter-count and a few
> test cases.

OK. Any opinions on the location of the isParallelLoop() check? Shall I
put it to Loop so it is more widely accessible? I.e. Loop->isParallel().

-- 
Pekka