[LLVMdev] ARMv5 Buildbot

[David Tweed]

Assuming it's ok with all the other stakeholders (yeah, I know I've been
hanging management types all day...) it's fine with me. My only thing is
that I don't currently have access to any of that hardware, so if after
fixing it goes back to red for non-trivial reasons I won't really be able to
help track down what's causing the issues it is highlighting.

 

Cheers,

Dave 

 

From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On
Behalf Of Renato Golin
Sent: 26 February 2013 17:10
To: David Blaikie
Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] ARMv5 Buildbot

 

On 26 February 2013 16:14, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

I'm not sure I understand your question. Fail tests continue to run so we
find out if they start passing as seems to be the case here. If llvm is now
free of whatever bugs caused these things to fail (ie: it's not just that
these stopped failing on this hardware but in all environments the xfail is
for) then they should just be un-xfailed.

Sorry, I got confused... starting over...

 

Some tests fail on ARMv7, others on ARMv5, and ExecutionEngine is old enough
(and never worked properly on ARM) for me to care much for it. My question,
and I think I have answered, is if it was possible to specify sub-arch, and
it is if it's in the triple (right?), so "XFAIL: armv5" should do the trick
if "armv5" is in the triple.

 

I confirm that the attached patch worked on my Panda and my laptop (x86_64),
but I think it won't work on the llvm-arm-linux bot, since it's nor forcing
"armv5" triple, but "arm-pc-linux" which won't match, though the armv7 ones
will not XFAIL on it, thus passing. I'll commit and see how it behaves on
the armv5 bot.

 

David / Xerxes / Galina,

 

Is it ok if we change the buildmaster to call that bot-group
"llvm-armv5-linux" or "llvm-arm-926"? So I can force the triple on the
buildmaster config?

 

cheers,

--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130226/656e8171/attachment.html>