[LLVMdev] ARM LNT test-suite Buildbot

[Renato Golin]

Thanks a lot, Tim! This will save me a huge amount of time! ;)

Maybe I should start with them first, then, and change the tests or the
expected results to account for architecture changes.

I'll also need you input on the AArch64 side later on. We should aim to
clear both 32 and 64 architectures on each change, if possible.

cheers,
--renato


On 19 February 2013 14:04, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Renato,
>
> I've investigated a few of these for AArch64 recently, and some of the
> results will be applicable in the 32-bit world too.
>
> > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/12-IOtest/iotest.execution_time
>
> This is because of disagreement between ABIs over whether "char" is
> signed. ARM says no, x86 says yes.
>
> >
> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-bitcount/automotive-bitcount.execution_time
>
> This is also failing on x86, I think
> (
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fnt/builds/14868/steps/make.test-suite/logs/fail.LLC
> )
>
> > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-fft.execution_time
> > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram.execution_time (8 of
> > SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/puzzle.execution_time
>
> I've also seen failures on these with x86, though they seem to be
> passing on the bot I linked to. I think I tracked down the last to a
> dependence on the exact output of the C library's random number
> generator, which is obviously non-portable.
>
> Tim.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130219/7e646212/attachment.html>