[LLVMdev] RE : Is there any llvm neon intrinsic that maps to vmla.f32 instruction ?
Lang Hames
lhames at gmail.com
Tue Feb 12 23:31:03 PST 2013
Hi Sebastien,
How many extra vmlas did you see in 433.milc due to disabling
-vmlx-forwarding?
As I mentioned earlier, I saw only two additional integer vmlx instructions
when I tested.
Could you send me your 433.milc compile setup? (os, flags, compiler
version, etc.). I'd like to try to reproduce your results.
Cheers,
Lang.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote:
> On 12 February 2013 16:56, Sebastien DELDON-GNB <sebastien.deldon at st.com>wrote:
>
>> If this helps taking your decision, there are at least two benchmarks for
>> which disabling vmlx-forwarding makes a significant difference.
>>
>
> I think Evan's worry was to base this decision on visible and
> comprehensible benchmarks, such as the test-suite.
>
>
> If I get lucky I may be able to run on a panda board by next week and have
>> more info to share
>>
>
> That'd be great, thanks!
>
> --renato
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130212/46719a6a/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list