[LLVMdev] Parallel Loop Metadata
Tobias Grosser
tobias at grosser.es
Tue Feb 12 09:02:01 PST 2013
On 02/12/2013 05:54 PM, Nadav Rotem wrote:
>
>> I have the feeling option 2) does not work for you, but I don't yet understand your reasons.
>
> My inclination to prefer #1 is due to its simplicity. But, if #1 does not work because it creates a correctness problems then #2 is the only option that is left on the table.
Unfortunately. :-(
Does your reply mean you agree that option 2) should be taken?
In case you do, how should we proceed? Should Pekka submit his patch for
a final pre-commit review?
If option 2) is OK, Paul could also try to produce this metadate from
his #pragma ivdep parser.
Cheers
Tobias
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list