[LLVMdev] Parallel Loop Metadata

Tobias Grosser tobias at grosser.es
Tue Feb 12 09:02:01 PST 2013


On 02/12/2013 05:54 PM, Nadav Rotem wrote:
>
>> I have the feeling option 2) does not work for you, but I don't yet understand your reasons.
>
> My inclination to prefer #1 is due to its simplicity. But, if #1 does not work because it creates a correctness problems then #2 is the only option that is left on the table.

Unfortunately. :-(

Does your reply mean you agree that option 2) should be taken?
In case you do, how should we proceed? Should Pekka submit his patch for 
a final pre-commit review?

If option 2) is OK, Paul could also try to produce this metadate from 
his #pragma ivdep parser.

Cheers
Tobias




More information about the llvm-dev mailing list