[LLVMdev] Build bot fatigue

[Bob Wilson]

On Dec 29, 2013, at 3:59 PM, David Tweed <david.tweed at gmail.com> wrote:
>> This isn't new. Just how the boys have always worked.
>> 
>> The biggest thing would be to move boots over to the phased builder
>> infrastructure pioneered by apple (they use it internally and I believe most
>> of it has been upstreamed by Daniel Dunbar and David Tweed) that sets up
>> dependencies (eg: testing debug info depends on the compiler paying the
>> basic check first) and refuse/caching of build product (eg: use the output
>> of the basic checks to test the debug info, rather than rebuilding the
>> compiler on every builder).
> 
> Just to note that I suspect it's someone else you're thinking of
> regarding the phased
> builder. (Although I did quite a bit of work on the ARM buildbots late last year
> I haven't been involved in the phased builder work.)

That would be David Dean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131229/af2dc55c/attachment.html>