[LLVMdev] Making LLVM safer in out-of-memory situations

Rick Mann rmann at latencyzero.com
Thu Dec 12 11:24:40 PST 2013


On Dec 12, 2013, at 04:25 , Gasiunas, Vaidas <vaidas.gasiunas at sap.com> wrote:

> To address these requirements we have developed a set of patches improving performance and malfunction safety of certain compiler passes and would be interested in contributing them at some point. Before proposing concrete changes, we would like to know what the general interest is with respect to making LLVM safer in out-of-memory situations. 

I'm in favor! I can't imagine we shouldn't be able to craft fixes that don't otherwise adversely affect LLVM.

-- 
Rick



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 204 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131212/d4a591f2/attachment.sig>


More information about the llvm-dev mailing list