[LLVMdev] outdated debug metamata doc?

[Pan, Wei]

Yes, that is what I was mentioning. (I did not go through all of them.)

There are also some minor alignment issues such as
- basic, derived, composite type descriptors  (second fields)
- subprogram descriptor (Function field)

-----Original Message-----
From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:39 AM
To: Pan, Wei; Manman Ren
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] outdated debug metamata doc?

On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Pan, Wei <wei.pan at intel.com> wrote:
> Is anyone maintaining this page?

ish. We sometimes forget to update it for a while.

> http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html#composite-type-descript
> ors
>
>
>
> DIBuilder::createSubroutineType seems to generate metadatas with a 
> different format.

composite types recently got one new field (a string unique
identifier) & the template arguments field was made non-optional.

Were there other differences you noticed/were referring to?