[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] -fsanitize=address on centos 6.4

Tue Aug 20 03:55:53 PDT 2013

I have no idea about this particular error. Perhaps someone else can chime
in?

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Sharma, Yogesh <
Yogesh.Sharma at saabsensis.com> wrote:

>  I did a make update.  I thought I was running the newest version of
> compiler-rt.  But now I can’t even get the project to build.  I get the
> following error:****
>
> ** **
>
> i386-redhat-linux-gnu-clang++:
> clang/llvm/include/llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h:544: typename
> llvm::SmallVectorTemplateBase<T, llvm::isPodLike::value>::iterator
> llvm::SmallVectorImpl<T>::insert(typename llvm::SmallVectorTemplateBase<T,
> llvm::isPodLike::value>::iterator, const T&) [with T = const char*]:
> Assertion `I <= this->end() && "Inserting past the end of the vector."'
> failed.****
>
> 0  i386-redhat-linux-gnu-clang++ 0x0000000002431452
> llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(_IO_FILE*) + 34****
>
> 1  i386-redhat-linux-gnu-clang++ 0x000000000243264a****
>
> 2  libpthread.so.0               0x0000003b1d60f500****
>
> 3  libc.so.6                     0x0000003b1d2328a5 gsignal + 53****
>
> 4  libc.so.6                     0x0000003b1d234085 abort + 373****
>
> 5  libc.so.6                     0x0000003b1d22ba1e****
>
> 6  libc.so.6                     0x0000003b1d22bae0 __assert_perror_fail +
> 0****
>
> 7  i386-redhat-linux-gnu-clang++ 0x00000000006adb64 main + 8420****
>
> 8  libc.so.6                     0x0000003b1d21ecdd __libc_start_main + 253
> ****
>
> 9  i386-redhat-linux-gnu-clang++ 0x00000000006a5759****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Sergey Matveev [mailto:earthdok at google.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 19, 2013 1:26 PM
> *To:* Sharma, Yogesh; Kostya Serebryany; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu List
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] -fsanitize=address on centos 6.4****
>
>  ** **
>
> +kcc, llvmdev****
>
> ** **
>
> I think your compiler-rt checkout is out of date, because r188635 is
> supposed to fix that exact issue.****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Sharma, Yogesh <
> Yogesh.Sharma at saabsensis.com> wrote:****
>
> Sorry about that.  I forgot a d:****
>
>  ****
>
> ldd (GNU libc) 2.12****
>
> Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.****
>
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
> ****
>
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> ****
>
> Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper.****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Sergey Matveev [mailto:earthdok at google.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 19, 2013 1:08 PM
> *To:* Sharma, Yogesh
> *Cc:* Kostya Serebryany; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu****
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] -fsanitize=address on centos 6.4****
>
>  ****
>
> This looks like the output of "ld --version". What we need is your glibc
> version, which is given by "ldd --version".****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Sharma, Yogesh <
> Yogesh.Sharma at saabsensis.com> wrote:****
>
> GNU ld version 2.20.51.0.2-5.36.el6 20100205****
>
> Copyright 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.****
>
> This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of*
> ***
>
> the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later
> version.****
>
> This program has absolutely no warranty.****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Kostya Serebryany [mailto:kcc at google.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, August 19, 2013 5:36 AM
> *To:* Sergey Matveev
> *Cc:* Sharma, Yogesh; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [cfe-dev] -fsanitize=address on centos 6.4****
>
>  ****
>
> +llvmdev (llvm-dev does not exist)****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Sergey Matveev <earthdok at google.com>
> wrote:****
>
> > First, could you please run the test with env.var.
> ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=1 ****
>
>  ****
>
> No need for that, actually, since this is a familiar issue. Sharma, could
> you please paste the output of "ldd --version" here?****
>
>  ****
>
> Sergey****
>
>  ****
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com>
> wrote:****
>
> +llvm-dev, earthdok at google.com****
>
> bcc:cfe-dev****
>
>  ****
>
> Hi Sharma, ****
>
> We don't have centos, so we'd ask you for some assistance. ****
>
> First, could you please run the test with env.var.
> ASAN_OPTIONS=verbosity=1 ****
>
>  ****
>
> Sergey, this CHECK is yours, please take a look. ****
>
>  ****
>
> --kcc ****
>
>  ****
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Sharma, Yogesh <
> Yogesh.Sharma at saabsensis.com> wrote:****
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the SVN version of clang+llvm does not like
> -fsanitize=address on centos 6.4.  By "like" I mean it asserts anytime a
> thread is created.  With errors like:
>
> ==18015==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:
> clang/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_linux_libcdep.cc:251
> "((*tls_addr + *tls_size)) <= ((*stk_addr + *stk_size))" (0xf2f7d030,
> 0xf2f7d000)
>
> If I use the llvm+clang 3.3 version it works properly.
> -
> This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain
> information that is company confidential or privileged.  Any technical data
> in this message may be exported only in accordance with the U.S.
> International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Parts 120-130) or the
> Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774). Unauthorized use
> is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
> recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
> recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this
> message. If you have received this email in error, please delete it, and
> advise the sender immediately.
> -
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-dev mailing list
> cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>
> *This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain
> information that is company confidential or privileged. Any technical data
> in this message may be exported only in accordance with the U.S.
> International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Parts 120-130) or the
> Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774). Unauthorized use
> is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
> recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
> recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this
> message. If you have received this email in error, please delete it, and
> advise the sender immediately. *****
>
>  ****
>
>
> *This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain
> information that is company confidential or privileged. Any technical data
> in this message may be exported only in accordance with the U.S.
> International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Parts 120-130) or the
> Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774). Unauthorized use
> is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
> recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
> recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this
> message. If you have received this email in error, please delete it, and
> advise the sender immediately. *****
>
> ** **
>
> *This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain
> information that is company confidential or privileged. Any technical data
> in this message may be exported only in accordance with the U.S.
> International Traffic in Arms Regulations (22 CFR Parts 120-130) or the
> Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774). Unauthorized use
> is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
> recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended
> recipient, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use this
> message. If you have received this email in error, please delete it, and
> advise the sender immediately. *
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130820/cdd86e42/attachment.html>