[LLVMdev] OCaml bindings broken in trunk

[Bob Wilson]

Didn't Benjamin already fix this in svn 163502?

On Sep 10, 2012, at 10:08 AM, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at apple.com> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> 
>> The linking issue is a recent breakage.
>> I traced it back to r163175. Basically LLVMConstInlineAsm() got an additional parameter, but the C headers and the OCaml bindings were not updated accordingly.
> 
> r163175 was my change.  I'm not familiar with the OCaml project.  If I'm responsible for updating said C headers/OCaml bindings, would someone mind pointing me in the right direction?  If not, let me know if I can be of assistance.
> 
> Chad
> 
>> 
>> About the miscompilations, can you provide further details?
>> 
>> Nuno
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> I've recently upgraded my project-local copy of LLVM from 3.1svn to the latest 3.2svn, and all hell broke loose in my attempts to build OCaml projects.
>>> 
>>> Trying to narrow it down, I tried testing examples/OCaml-Kaleidoscope and eventually test/Bindings, only to discover that literally nothing in the repository which uses the OCaml bindings seems to build in the current trunk:
>>> 
>>> - OCaml-Kaleidoscope/Chapter{2-6} fail early with apparent Makefile misconfigurations
>>> - test/Bindings/OCaml/* fail to link for lack of `_LLVMConstInlineAsm`, which is also the first (of many) symbols I struggled to link correctly in my own project after upgrading and rebuilding.
>>> 
>>> Is this a known state of affairs?
>>> 
>>> This came up first on OS X 10.8.1, Homebrew OCaml 3.12.1, and a fresh bare checkout of trunk at 163420. I reproduced it exactly on Ubuntu 12.04 (with stock OCaml 3.12.1 and trunk at 163420).
>>> 
>>> Thanks. 
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev