[LLVMdev] [RFC] Extend LLVM IR to express "fast-math" at a per-instruction level

[Dan Gohman]

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Michael Ilseman <milseman at apple.com>wrote:
>
>
>> N - no NaNs
>>   x == x ==> true
>>
>
> This is not true if x is infinity.
>

Oops, I was wrong here. Infinity is defined to be equal to infinity.

Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121030/d8bcc2c7/attachment.html>