[LLVMdev] [RFC] Extend LLVM IR to express "fast-math" at a per-instruction level

[Eli Friedman]

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek
<kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 10/29/2012 6:34 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote:
>>
>>    N: no NaNs - ignore the existence of NaNs when convenient
>
> Maybe distinguish between quiet and signaling NaNs?

We already ignore the existence of signaling NaNs by default.  The
proposal could make that more clear, though.

-Eli