[LLVMdev] code-owner sporks

[Eli Friedman]

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> wrote:
>> This isn't viable; Github pull requests aren't visible on llvm-commits.
>
> No, this isn't viable under at least both assumptions:
>
> 1) Cost-benefit fails.  Github pull requests adds less value to the
> community than llvm-commits.
> 2) No technical solution exists.  Notifications of Github pull
> requests can't be sent to llvm-commits.
>
> #1 may or may not be the case, which is the point of this experiment.
> #2 is intentionally absurd.

Some technical solution might exist, but it would need to be in place
before any experiment along these lines.

Given that we already have http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com , it
seems like it would be a better idea to put effort in that direction.

-Eli