[LLVMdev] code-owner sporks

[dag at cray.com]

Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> writes:

> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:56:57AM -0600, dag at cray.com wrote:
>> > Ping at appropriate time intervals (~3 days is sane); 
>> 
>> 3 days is *not* sane.  The fact that we require pings at all indicates a
>> broken process.  I don't understand why there is such resistance to a
>> patch queue.
>
> I don't see any resistance, quite the contrary. From all the list
> traffic it is quite clear that a review system is currently being
> tested...

That is good!  I did find references to that during my research for
Sean.  Is this described on the web site somewhere?

                             -David