[LLVMdev] Code Ownership - BBVectorize

[Chris Lattner]

On Nov 14, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:43 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> SelectionDAG is big enough to have multiple owners. Legalizer, dag combine, etc. can each have a separate owner.
>> 
>> I don't think that makes sense given our model of code owner.  The important task here is ensuring that each piece gets reviewed.  Splitting things up at such a fine level doesn't help with that.
> 
> Ok. Then I nominate Owen. SelectionDAG needs a code owner. 

SGTM.

> Instcombine also needs one. Would Eli like to serve as code owner?

Meador was interested in instcombine.  If Eli is interested, Meador and Eli should talk. :)

> Andy Trick - loop strength reduction?

Makes sense.

> Now that my domain is quickly being taken over by folks, I suppose I need to clarify what I own. :) If there are no objections, I will take ARM target and parts of code generator that are not covered by anyone else. 

Sounds fine to me.

-Chris