[LLVMdev] RFC: Code Ownership
Justin Holewinski
justin.holewinski at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 08:56:23 PST 2012
On the topic of code owners:
Would it make sense to add target-specific code owners for the codegen
targets? Some of the targets are more esoteric (e.g. NVPTX, CellSPU,
AMDGPU) and may benefit from more fine-grained code ownership.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote:
> On 12 November 2012 15:55, Meador Inge <meadori at codesourcery.com> wrote:
> > Another point to address is whether there can be more than one owner in a
> > particular area.
>
> There might be more than one code expert per area, which can be
> referenced by the code owner, but I wouldn't have more than one owner.
>
> Owning part of the code means you'll have to keep a sharper eye on
> particular changes than others and should raise concerns when they're
> due, and not to take the blame for breaking or charged for fixing
> broken code.
>
> --
> cheers,
> --renato
>
> http://systemcall.org/
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
--
Thanks,
Justin Holewinski
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121112/093d3290/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list