[LLVMdev] RFC: Code Ownership
Chris Lattner
clattner at apple.com
Sun Nov 11 21:58:48 PST 2012
On Nov 11, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Meador Inge <meadori at codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2012, at 12:44 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 10, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Chris's "keynote" at the LLVM Developers' Conference included a call for code owners, and my company has a heavy dependency on Bitcode, I propose taking ownership of:
>>>
>>> lib/Bitcode/*
>>> include/Bitcode/*
>>>
>>> This means that I'll be committed to documenting (yay) the implementation and responsible for reviewing patches and commits, as well as overall code quality and maintenance. It's a small section of the overall tree, and I realize that it is a critical portion that touches virtually the whole project.
>>
>> This sounds like a great idea to me. Unless someone objects in the next few days, consider it yours :). Please update docs/DeveloperPolicy to list yourself in the owners section. Thanks Joe,
>
> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? I have been reworking the library call
> simplification infrastructure recently and will be happy to sign up as an owner for that.
I think that "directory level" is the right granularity. If you're interested in signing up to maintain and review the whole instcombine library, that would be a great level. To see what this entails, see:
http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#code-owners
-Chris
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list