[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code?

[Kostya Serebryany]

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we alter the build system so that when building a run-time library it
>> modifies all .cpp files like this:
>>    namespace FOO {
>>    <file body>
>>    }
>> This will give us essentially the same thing, but w/o system dependent
>> object file hackery.
>> Maybe we can add a Clang flag to add such a namespace for us?
>>
>
> I think this is essentially what Dmitry was talking about w/ past STLport
> experience. It has lots of limitations:
>

Patching object files still sounds much scarier and harder to port.
I'd prefer to find a solution that involves only source files and maybe
clang.
Pondering...




> - You can't use the normal system standard library
>
- You have to build the standard library from source
> - You can't wrap certain parts of it (operator new, delete, a few other
> things)
> - You can't re-use any C libraries (zlib for example)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120621/ece7d7b2/attachment.html>