[LLVMdev] Structs passed by value
Martinez, Javier E
javier.e.martinez at intel.com
Thu Jun 14 14:05:26 PDT 2012
Jan,
Thanks for the reply. The behavior of the default case is pass by value but the mechanism is pass by reference as seen in the code. My understanding is that the byVal is there to indicate that the data pointed to by the parameter shouldn't be updated when the function ends with the internal copy value. I still think that a true pass by value mechanism doesn't exist in LLVM.
Javier
From: Jan Voung [mailto:jvoung at google.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 11:58 AM
To: Martinez, Javier E
Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Structs passed by value
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Martinez, Javier E <javier.e.martinez at intel.com<mailto:javier.e.martinez at intel.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to change the default behavior for how structures are passed to functions to use pass-by-value. Currently LLVM's default behavior is to pass structures by reference. I'm not disputing the benefits of this but I really want to change the default behavior for experimentation purposes.
Are you sure that the current behavior is passing structures by reference? In your example, the function "convert" is given a pointer %in, but that pointer is marked "byval". According to http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html that means that it is pass-by-value:
"This indicates that the pointer parameter should really be passed by value to the function. The attribute implies that a hidden copy of the pointee is made between the caller and the callee, so the callee is unable to modify the value in the caller."
etc...
Is the problem that in the backend, you do not see a copy being made?
To this end I've changed the code in DefaultABIInfo::classifyArgumentType() to use the different types. What I've found is that none of the options yield the expected results for the input code (see below). Except for the indirect case, the function signature is changed to take each structure element. How can I modify LLVM to pass structures by value?
Thanks,
Javier
[Original Code]
struct myType {
long val;
};
int convert(struct myType in)
{
return (int)in.val;
}
[Expected Result]
define i32 @convert(%myType %in) nounwind readonly alwaysinline{
entry:
%in.addr = alloca %myType, align 8
store %myType %in, %myType* %in.addr, align 8
%0 = getelementptr inbounds %myType* %in.addr, i32 0, i32 0
%1 = load i64* %0, align 8
%conv = trunc i64 %1 to i32
ret i32 %conv
}
[ABIArgInfo::getIndirect(0) - Default]
%struct.myType = type { i64 }
define i32 @convert(%struct.myType* nocapture byval %in) nounwind readonly {
entry:
%val = getelementptr inbounds %struct.myType* %in, i64 0, i32 0
%0 = load i64* %val, align 8, !tbaa !0
%conv = trunc i64 %0 to i32
ret i32 %conv
}
[ABIArgInfo::getExtend(), ABIArgInfo::getDirect(), ABIArgInfo::getExpand()]
define i32 @convert(i64 %in.coerce0) nounwind readnone {
entry:
%conv = trunc i64 %in.coerce0 to i32
ret i32 %conv
}
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120614/e5e1fcae/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list