[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction?
Michael.Kang
blackfin.kang at gmail.com
Mon Jun 11 19:11:01 PDT 2012
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Joey Gouly <joel.gouly at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Xiu,
>
> The Verifier pass runs a PreVerifier pass, which does not honour the
> action argument,
> and will always abort on a broken module, (Line 106,
> lib/VMCore/Verifier.cpp)
>
So the argument can not be used as described as the official document? I
just want to make sure of that and probably we
can find another way to deal with broken module.
Thanks
MK
>
> Perhaps you should file a bug against this, to allow you to not abort if
> you so wish.
>
> Joey
>
> On 11 June 2012 09:41, Guowei Xu <myesis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone:
>>
>> I have a little question about the second argument *action* of
>> verifyFunction.
>>
>> In docs:
>>
>> *Enumerator: * *AbortProcessAction*
>>
>> verifyModule will print to stderr and abort()
>> *PrintMessageAction*
>>
>> verifyModule will print to stderr and return true
>> *ReturnStatusAction*
>>
>> verifyModule will just return true
>>
>> But it still abort when I pass
>> PrintMessageAction/ReturnStatusAction to function.
>>
>> Log:
>> Basic Block in function 'jitmain' does not have terminator!
>> label %load_store
>> LLVM ERROR: Broken module, no Basic Block terminator!
>>
>>
>> Is there something wrong?
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> -myesis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>
--
www.skyeye.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120612/0ab2f5ba/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list