[LLVMdev] Function Pass Manager
John Criswell
criswell at illinois.edu
Tue Jun 5 08:54:57 PDT 2012
On 6/5/12 10:39 AM, Ralf Karrenberg wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 6/5/12 4:31 PM, John Criswell wrote:
>> On 4/12/12 3:32 AM, Ivan Llopard wrote:
>>> Hi again,
>>>
>>> I come back to this issue with an example. It's a pass which does
>>> nothing but throw the 'Unable to schedule' error.
>>>
>>> namespace {
>>> struct MyPass : public FunctionPass {
>>> static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
>>> MyPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
>>> initializeMyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
>>> }
>>> virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage&AU) const {
>>> AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);
>>> AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);
>>> }
>>> virtual bool runOnFunction(Function&F);
>>> };
>>> }
>>
>> Is LoopSimplifyID an analysis pass or a transform (optimization) pass?
>
> It is a transform pass (it can alter the CFG).
>
>> You cannot reliably use the addRequired() method to force a transform
>> pass to run before another pass; there are cases in which the
>> PassManager cannot schedule the required passes. You must simply ensure
>> that LoopSimplify is executed before your pass.
>
> I am afraid I do not understand this. What is the purpose of
> addRequired() if not ensuring that the pass is run before execution of
> my own pass?
The addRequired method is designed to tell the PassManager which
*analysis* passes to run before your pass. This allows the PassManager
to optimize the pass schedule so that analysis passes are only re-run
when needed. Analysis passes don't modify the IR so PassManager can
always find a way to schedule the passes.
The reason why you can't require a transform pass is because you can get
impossible-to-schedule pass schedules (or, at least, schedules that
PassManager isn't smart enough to schedule because it assumes that all
required passes are analysis passes) . For example, assume Pass C
requires Passes A and B. Passes A and B invalidate all other passes
because they are transform passes. There's no possible schedule for
these passes.
>
> I would be perfectly happy with *any* solution that allows me to
> ensure that LoopSimplify is executed before my FunctionPass.
Sadly, there isn't such a feature. It is the job of the person (or
program) putting together the pass schedule to ensure that transform
passes are run in the correct order relative to other transform passes.
Only analysis passes are scheduled automatically by PassManager.
What you could do to catch bugs is to write an analysis pass that
verifies that the loops have the structure that you need; this pass
would assert out if the loops aren't in canonical form. Your pass could
require this new analysis pass. If someone forgets to run the pass that
puts loops into canonical form, this analysis pass would catch the error.
-- John T.
>
> Thanks,
> Ralf
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list