[LLVMdev] proposal for exploiting undefined behavior much more aggressively

[John Regehr]

> Also, as a bit of a teaser, I think Richard Smith is going to be looking into
> providing much more extensive optional *checking* of undefined behavior.
> Essentially, '-fcatch-undefined-behavior' may grow some serious teeth. This
> should allow users to check their code fairly aggressively for UB but not
> needlessly punish code or those debugging code.

Very cool.  I'd like to hear more.

BTW we're still working on getting IOC into shape for inclusion.

John