[LLVMdev] [PROPOSAL] LLVM multi-module support

[dag at cray.com]

Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> writes:

> Hi Tobias, I didn't really get it.  Is the idea that the same bitcode is
> going to be codegen'd for different architectures, or is each sub-module
> going to contain different bitcode?  In the later case you may as well
> just use multiple modules, perhaps in conjunction with a scheme to store
> more than one module in the same file on disk as a convenience.

I tend to agree.  Why do we need a whole new submodule concept?

                              -Dave