[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
Duncan Sands
baldrick at free.fr
Tue Dec 11 22:53:45 PST 2012
On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote:
> The problem remains after the buildmaster restart.
The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report" is no longer
empty. Does anyone know what fixed them?
Ciao, Duncan.
>
> Thanks
>
> Galina
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:42 AM
> To: Galina Kistanova
> Cc: Duncan Sands; llvm-lab-wg at lists.minormatter.com; Galina Kistanova; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Galina Kistanova
> <gkistanova at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end.
>> Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken.
>> Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different...
>> I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and restart the master in the evening, but could do this sooner if you feel like this is urgent.
>
> Given the state of things I don't think anyone will mind if you do it
> sooner. Whenever's your soonest convenience sounds fine by me.
>
> - David
>
>>
>> Please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Galina
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: llvm-lab-wg-bounces at lists.minormatter.com [mailto:llvm-lab-wg-bounces at lists.minormatter.com] On Behalf Of David Blaikie
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:12 AM
>> To: Duncan Sands
>> Cc: llvm-lab-wg at lists.minormatter.com; Galina Kistanova; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> Subject: Re: [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>>> All the LLVM lab FNT builders were reporting failures in the same set of
>>> tests
>>> (scimark2, LivermooreLoops, some others). Now they've all turned green but
>>> the
>>> same tests are still failing. I don't see any commits to deliberately make
>>> the
>>> FNT pass, so it looks like someone broke failure detection... Note that the
>>> FNT "report" text became empty at the same time. Here's what "report" was
>>> like
>>> before:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fnt/builds/12575/steps/make.test-suite/logs/report
>>>
>>> and after:
>>>
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fnt/builds/12576/steps/make.test-suite/logs/report
>>>
>>> The first green builds are:
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fnt/builds/12576
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-linux-fnt/builds/57
>>>
>>> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/dragonegg-x86_64-linux-gcc-4.6-fnt/builds/1983
>>>
>>> Does anyone know what might have caused this?
>>
>> [Thought it might've been my change (r169769) but that doesn't look
>> like it intersects with this particular test task]
>>
>> I think you're on the right track with the logs. If the log that
>> reaches the buildmaster is empty then we won't find any failures &
>> we'll report success.
>>
>> Have you checked any of the slaves to see if the log files are empty
>> in the builds themselves?
>>
>> Have you run a local execution of the test suite uisng roughly the
>> same commands & observed whether the reports are empty coming out of
>> that?
>>
>> - David
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-lab-wg mailing list
>> llvm-lab-wg at lists.minormatter.com
>> http://minormatter.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-lab-wg
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list