[LLVMdev] VLIW code generation for LLVM backend

[Triple Yang]

Yes, I can see that.
Thank you, Sergei, for the great work.

Regards.

2012/8/13 Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org>:
> But we are really striving to change it fast :)
>
> Dan,
>
>   My comparative point was that LLVM has a greater potential to accommodate
> VLIW going forward than GCC does at this point.
> Would you agree to that?
>
> Sergei
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dan Gohman [mailto:gohman at apple.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 12:30 PM
>> To: Sergei Larin
>> Cc: 'Triple Yang'; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
>> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] VLIW code generation for LLVM backend
>>
>>
>> On Aug 9, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Yang,
>> >
>> >  This might not be such a tough choice on engineering side - one of
>> > the LLVM differentiators is the ground-up, early introduced support
>> > for VLIW specific features.
>>
>> Actually, LLVM lacked support for VLIW until fairly recently, and it
>> has relatively few VLIW-specific features.
>>
>> Dan
>
>



-- 
杨勇勇 (Yang Yongyong)