[LLVMdev] Issue with GetElementPtrInst in Instruction Combining pass
Pankaj Gode
godepankaj at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 17 07:21:52 PDT 2012
With reference to the previous query,
I think, i miscalculated the offset, just recalculating.
1. without instruction combining
coupling member variable, is at:
%struct._FRAME_DATA* %2, i32 0, i32 5
where "%2" is defined as:
%arrayidx3 = getelementptr inbounds i16* %Data, i32 1024, !dbg !446
%2 = bitcast i16* %arrayidx3 to %struct._FRAME_DATA*, !dbg !446
i.e. at 5 offset in FRAME_DATA i.e. the 6th element, i.e. coupling member variable.
i16, i16, i16, [6 x i16], [5 x i16], i16, i16, [3 x i16], [5x i16], [2 x i16], [5 x i32], i32 ,....
31 words = 124 bytes.(considering it is aligned to i32)
1024 + 31 = 1055
2. with instruction combining
coupling is at:
i16* %timeData, i32 1060
i.e. 1060 offset.
Still the location references by "without instruction combining" is 5 less from with instruction combining.
Earlier when I was using llvm2.9, instruction combining does not give me any problem. And similar code is generated as with llvm 3.0 instruction combining.
Is there any point where I can check for the exact issue?
Regards,
Pankaj
________________________________
From: Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr>
To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Issue with GetElementPtrInst in Instruction Combining pass
Hi Pankaj, your best bet is to send the entire bitcode before and after
instcombine runs.
Ciao, Duncan.
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120417/3e30a4ef/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-dev
mailing list