[LLVMdev] ConstantExpr refactoring

[Chris Lattner]

Yes, that's definitely still desired.  I wouldn't say it is "low impact" though :)

-Chris

On Apr 14, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Renato Golin wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> After 6 months away, I'm looking for some low impact, unimportant area
> of LLVM to get back in sync with the code base.
> 
> Is anyone looking at this bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10368
> 
> Is it still valid/desired?
> 
> -- 
> cheers,
> --renato
> 
> http://systemcall.org/
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev